G.Seenivasan v. Kannammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought condonation of 158 days' delay in restoring a Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, citing illness and continuous medical treatment. Respondents raised no objection. The court allowed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 158 days in filing the restoration petition for S.A.No.36 of 2021 condoned; petition ordered.
What the court decided
CMP.No.31566 of 2025 in S.A.No.36 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04-02-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP.No.31566 of 2025 in S.A.No.36 of 2021
1. G.Seenivasan
S/O Late A Gopal, No. 42 First Street, Ranganathapuram, Tiruppur Kongu Main Road, Tiruppur Tk., Tiruppur Dist.
Appellant(s)
Vs
1. Kannammal
W/O Late Kolandasamy, Res At Manjasolakollai, Chinnaveerasangili Village, Perundurai Tk, Erode District
2.Sivasaravanan
S/O Late Kolandasamy, Res At Manjasolakollai, Chinnaveerasangili Village, Perundurai Tk, Erode District
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the delay of 158 days in filing a petition to restore the Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Seenivasan
- respondent
Kannammal
- respondent
Sivasaravanan
- respondent
Kavitha
- respondent
Sekaran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court