The Court condoned a delay of 57 days in filing the appeal, noting the short period and cause shown, despite opposition. The appeal was listed for admission.
Condonation of delay of 57 days in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.30225 of 2025 in WA SR No.178799 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
C.M.P.No.30225 of 2025 in W.A.SR No.178799 of 2025
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Rep. by the Executive Engineer cum Administrative Officer, Nandanam Division, No.485, MTB Building, Nandanam, Chennai -600 035
Applicant
Vs
C.Velusamy, 4/1, Anna Poorani Nagar, Palani Andavar Mill Backside, Udumalpet,Tamilnadu 642126.
Respondent
For Applicant: Mr. D.Veerasekaran
For Respondent: Ms.G.Aishwarya for M/s.Viruksham Legal
____________ Page 1 of 2_
CMP No.30225 of 2025 in WA SR No.178799 of 2025
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent.
filing the appeal.
the respondent, we are inclined to condone the delay.
List the appeal for admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
21.01.2026
sasi
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 57 days in filing appeal should be condoned?
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board
C. Velusamy
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
