P Krishnamoorthy v. Thangaraj(Died). 1.NATESAN
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court common order dated 27-02-2026 by K. Kumaresh Babu J.; CMP Nos. 28875, 28879 and 28880 of 2024 in SA No. 601 of 2020; condonation of delay of 844 days; setting aside abatement of second appeal caused by death of first respondent Thangaraj; impleadment of legal representatives Chitra, Preshmika, Gowkul and Jeevarasi as respondents No. 6 to 9; appellant P. Krishnamoorthy; counsel for respondents S. Kalyanaraman raised no objection; petitions ordered as prayed for; Registry directed to amend cause title; purely procedural, no merits adjudication, no precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 844 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement condoned; abatement of SA No. 601 of 2020 caused by the death of the first respondent (Thangaraj) set aside; legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Chitra, Preshmika, Gowkul and Jeevarasi) brought on record and impleaded as respondents No. 6 to 9; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendments to the cause title.