Civil miscellaneous petitions seeking amendment in a second appeal; court allowed them, directed Registry to carry out necessary amendments, and adjourned the matter for an application to implead the deceased respondent's wife.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.27078, 27085 and 27088 of 2024 in S.A.No.61 of 2020
S.SOUNTHAR,J.
Ms.G.Indira, learned counsel for M/s.R.Meenal, learned counsel, who takes notice to the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the deceased sole respondent-Poorasamy got another legal representative-Malarkodi, namely his wife and the said legal representative has not been shown as one of the respondents in these civil miscellaneous petitions.
07.04.2026
dm
S.A.No.61 of 2020 petitioner (appellant)
Poorasamy
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
