Allowed¶25

Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Ltd. v. P.Jayanthi

Madras HC12 Mar 2026CMP/23350/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay — 362 days — Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against MACT Vellore judgment dated 06.06.2023 in MCOP.No. 922/2016 — Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. v. P.Jayanthi and M.Pannerselvam — CMP No. 23350 of 2025 in CMA SR.No.120861 of 2025 — delay condoned on affidavit — records to Lok Adalat on 14.03.2026 — parties directed to appear.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 362 days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal condoned; Registry to number the Appeal (CMA SR.No.120861 of 2025) if otherwise in order and, the parties being willing to settle, forward the records to the Lok Adalat scheduled on 14.03.2026; parties directed to appear before the Lok Adalat on 14.03.2026. ¶25

Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs P.Jayanthi — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1/3 CMP No. 23350 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

CMP No. 23350 of 2025 in

¶7

CMA SR.No.120861 of 2025

¶8

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep by Managing Director, Kanchipuram Region, Kanchipuram Taluk and District.

¶9

Appellant(s) Vs

¶10

P.Jayanthi 2.M.Pannerselvam

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER

¶13

To condone the delay of 362 days in preferring this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Judgment dated 06.06.2023 passed in MCOP.No. 922/2016 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Vellore in the Additional District Judge (FTC), Vellore.

¶14

For Appellant(s): Mr.A.Vinothraj

¶15

For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran

¶16

ORDER

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.)

¶18

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 362 days in preferring

¶19

the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Judgment dated 06.06.2023, passed in MCOP. No. 922/2016, by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge (FTC), Vellore.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

2/3

¶22

CMP No. 23350 of 2025

¶23

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for

¶24

the respondents.

¶25

3.For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned. Registry to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and on numbering since the parties are willing to settle the issue, Registry

¶26

may forward the records to the Lok Adalat scheduled on 14.03.2026.

¶27