Allowed¶24

M.Velyayutham v. Dhanasekaran

Madras HC25 Feb 2026CMP/22176/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court common order dated 25-02-2026 by Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J. in CMP Nos.22176, 22178 & 22180 of 2025 in S.A.No.799 of 2009: condonation of delay of 2009 days; setting aside of abatement caused by death of first appellant J.Thangamuthu; impleadment of legal representatives as respondents 3 to 5 in the second appeal; consent order passed on respondents' counsel (C.Ramaraj) reporting no objection; appellants represented by M/s. MA.P. Thangavel; Registry directed to amend cause title.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 2009 days in filing the petition condoned; abatement caused by the death of the first appellant (J.Thangamuthu) in S.A.No.799 of 2009 set aside; legal representatives impleaded as respondents 3 to 5 in the main second appeal; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendment. ¶24

M.Velyayutham Vs Dhanasekaran — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25-02-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶5

CMP Nos.22176, 22178 & 22180 of 2025 in S.A.No.799 of 2009

¶6

M.Velayutham

¶7

2.Susila

¶8

3.Yoganathan

¶9

4.Velmurugan

¶10

Appellant(s) in all applications

¶11

¶12

Dhanasekaran

¶13

2.Gomathi

¶14

Respondent(s) in all applications

¶15

Prayer in CMP No.22176 of 2025: To condone the delay of 2009 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to death of the first appellant respondent namely Thangamuthu in S.A.No.799 of 2009

¶16

Prayer in CMP No.22178 of 2025: To set aside the abatement caused due to death of the first appellant respondent namely Thangamuthu in S.A.No.799 of 2009

¶17

Prayer in CMP No.22180 of 2025: To bring on record the respondents 2 to 4 herein as legal representatives of the deceased first appellant namely, J.Thangamuthu and array them as appellants 3 to 5 in S.A.No.962 of 2014.

¶18

For Appellant(s): M/s. MA.P. Thangavel For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Ramaraj

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

COMMON ORDER

¶21

These applications have been filed to condone the delay in filing the petition, to set aside the abatement caused due to death of the first appellant and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased third respondent.

¶22

Mr.C.Ramaraj, learned counsel for the respondents reported ‘No

¶23

Objection’ for ordering these applications.

¶24

In the circumstances, all the three applications are ordered and the respondents 3 to 5 herein shall stand impleaded as respondents 3 to 5 in the main second appeal.

¶25