Periyasamy v. Govindaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court single-judge order condoning 82-day delay in filing C.M.A.Sr. No.7866 of 2026 (civil miscellaneous appeal over Tribunal-fixed compensation); notice dispensed on first respondent; no objection from second respondent's counsel B. Sivakollapan; Registry to number and list appeal; conditional bar on interest for default period upon enhancement of compensation.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 82 days in preferring C.M.A.Sr. No.7866 of 2026 condoned; Registry directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order and list it in the usual course; petitioners denied interest for the default period if compensation is enhanced. ¶5