Jayanallammal v. St.Sebastian Church
Case brief
What is this about?
in S.A.No.1366 of 2000 V.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.1568 of 2026
in S.A.No.1366 of 2000
V.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN, J.
The petitioner has stated that notice was served on respondent Nos.14 and 16 through Court and privately. The summons have been returned as “No such person”. Hence, the present petition .
- I heard Mr.Sathya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Paul Das, learned counsel for contesting respondents.
- Mr. V.Paul Das, has no serious objection for allowing this petition.
- In view of the above, this petition is ordered. The petitioner shall take steps on respondent nos.14 and 16 alone for the hearing date on 11.02.2026. Notice shall be effected in one edition, namely "Malaimalar" having circulated in Erode District.
Call on 11.02.2026.
21.01.2026
kkd
1/1
Coram
V.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court