Gomathi v. Vijayarani
Case brief
What is this about?
A second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution when counsel was absent owing to ill-health. The Madras High Court accepted the explanation as bona fide and restored the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal SA No. 423 of 2022, earlier dismissed for non-prosecution on 22.04.2025, restored to file.
What the court decided
CMP No. 13979 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
CMP No. 13979 of 2025 AND SA NO. 423 OF 2022
Gomathi W/O.Kalidoss
..Appellant(s)
Vs
- Vijayarani W/O.Ravichandran
- State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its District Collector, Nagapattinam.
- Tahsildar Taluk Office, Mayiladuthurai
- Vanitha W/O.Krishnakumar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to counsel's ill-health should be restored to file.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gomathi W/O.Kalidoss
- respondent
Vijayarani W/O.Ravichandran
- respondent
State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its District Collector, Nagapattinam
- respondent
Tahsildar Taluk Office, Mayiladuthurai
- respondent
Vanitha W/O.Krishnakumar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court