Pongiannan v. Karuppasamy (Deceased), Sivasamy (Deceased) 1. Rukmani
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court order dated 22-01-2026 in CMP No. 13510 of 2025 (in CMP No. 19483 of 2023 in SA SR No. 99121 of 2007), Coram: T.V. Thamilselvi, J. Pongiannan (appellant; counsel M. Nandhakumar) versus Karuppasamy (deceased), Sivasamy (deceased), Rukmani, Karuppayal, Ananthi, Vinayagamoorthy, Vijaya Kant and Elakiya (respondents; counsel A.R. Balaji). Subject: petition to implead the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent as respondents 3 to 5 in the pending CMP arising out of a Second Appeal (S.A. SR No. 99121 of 2007). Result: petition allowed; Registry directed to amend the cause title. No statutes, precedents, or monetary amounts involved.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed; legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent (proposed respondents 1 to 3) brought on record as respondents 3 to 5 in C.M.P.No.19483 of 2023; Registry directed to amend the cause title.