Allowed¶41

P.Govindaraj (Died) v. B.Bala Bhuvaneswari

Madras HC1 Jun 2026CMP/11293/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Abatement of second appeal set aside under Order XXII Rule 9 CPC; legal heirs of deceased sole appellant brought on record as appellants under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC; petitions allowed with no objection from 4th respondent; Madras High Court; C.M.P.Nos.11293 & 11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001; appeal to be listed on 15.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Proposed Petitioners 2 & 3, Rajamani and Jothikumar Govindaraj (legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant), brought on record as Appellants in S.A.No.1741 of 2001; abatement caused by the appellant's death set aside; Registry to amend the cause title in the Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal and list the appeal on 15.06.2026. ¶41

P.Govindaraj (Died) Vs B.Bala Bhuvaneswari — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P.Nos.11293 & 11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 01.06.2026

¶4

Coram: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶5

C.M.P.Nos.11293 & 11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001

¶6

1.P.Govindaraj (deceased) (Died on 14.11.2025) Sathy Road, Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 6.

¶7

...Appellant

¶8

2.Rajamani W/o. Late Govindaraj, 13, Pazhaniyappa Nagar, 1, Sowripalayam, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore – 641 028.

¶9

3.Jothikumar Govindaraj S/o. Late Govindaraj, 13, Pazhaniyappa Nagar, 1, Sowripalayam, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore – 641 028.

¶10

...Proposed Petitioners 2 & 3/ Proposed Appellants 2 & 3 in both C.M.Ps

¶11

Versus

¶12

1.B.Bala Bhuvaneswari W/o. Balasundaram, Kollavadugam Thottam, Palladam Taluk.

¶13

1/5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.M.P.Nos.11293 & 11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001

¶16

2.P.Ranganayakiammal Sathy Road, Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 6.

¶17

3.P.Jegannathan Sathy Road, Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 6.

¶18

4.G.Christoper Edison Sunder Singh S/o. J.Samuel Gnaniah, 45, Rajagopal Avenue, Thondamuthur Road, Vadavalli Via, Coimbatore Taluk, Coimbatore.

¶19

...Respondents/Respondents in both C.M.Ps

¶20

Prayer in C.M.P.No.11293 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001:

¶21

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to bring on record the proposed appellants 2 and 3 namely Rajamani and Jothikumar Govindaraj the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant in the above S.A.1741 of 2001 as party appellants in the above appeal.

¶22

Prayer in C.M.P.No.11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001:

¶23

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Order XXII Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant P.Govindaraj in the above S.A.No.1741 of 2001.

¶24

For Petitioners in both C.M.Ps : Ms.Jayshree for Mr.S.Sundaresan For Respondent – 4 in both C.M.Ps : Ms.G.Sri Jayashree for Mr.S.Arivazhagan

¶25

2/5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.M.P.Nos.11293 & 11300 of 2026 in S.A.No.1741 of 2001

¶28

COMMON ORDER

¶29

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition in C.M.P.No.11293 of 2026 has been filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to bring on record the Proposed Petitioners 2 & 3 viz., Rajamani and Jothikumar Govindaraj (legal heirs of the deceased sole Appellant in S.A.No.1741 of 2001) as Appellants in S.A.No.1741 of 2001.

¶30

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition in C.M.P.No.11300 of 2026 has

¶31

been filed under Order XXII Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole Appellant in S.A.No.1741 of 2001.

¶32