PatialaCargo Carrier v. Tube Investments of India Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court common order dated 24.04.2026; C.M.P. Nos.10614, 10617, 10625, 10629 and 10630 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. Nos.57099, 57098, 57100, 57101 and 57097 of 2026; petitioner Patiala Cargo Carrier, Transporter, Contractor & Commission Agents; respondents M/s.Tube Investments of India Ltd. (Unit of TI Cycles India) and M/s.New India Assurance Company Limited; counsel S.Syed Mazhar Hayath; petitions under Section 151 C.P.C. to dispense with certified copies dismissed as affidavit reasons unsatisfactory; liberty to produce certified copies, Registry to number appeals if in order; appeals under Section 131(1) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 96 C.P.C. and Order 41 Rule 1 C.P.C. against judgment and decree dated 07.03.2026 of Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai in C.O.S.Nos.328, 327, 330, 331 and 326 of 2024.
What did the court decide?
Dispensation refused; liberty reserved to the petitioner to produce the certified copy of the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2026, upon which the Registry is to number the Appeals (CAD) if otherwise in order.