Petition to condone 467 days' delay in filing an application to restore an appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, delay attributed to misprinting of counsel's name. Delay condoned and petition ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.10159 of 2026 in CMA No.2143 of 2018
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and K.RAJASEKAR, J.
(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.)
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 467 days in filing the petition to restore CMA No.2143 of 2018 which had been dismissed for non prosecution.
2.It had been stated that in the cause list the name of the counsel was wrongly printed as Mr.B.Sunarapandiyan instead of Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan and hence, the counsel was not able to appear before the Court.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the respondent.
4.Taking all factors into consideration, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. Registry may number the consequential application and print the name of Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan while listing the matter.
sli
(C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) 10.06.2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 467-day delay in filing a petition to restore a CMA dismissed for non-prosecution should be condoned.
C.V.Karthikeyan
K.Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
