Disposed

Seeniammal v. Pandiyan

Madras HC5 Jun 2026CMP/10056/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil miscellaneous petitions to implead legal representatives of a deceased respondent and record another representative in a pending second appeal were allowed, with directions to file an amended memorandum of grounds and list the appeal after four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Legal representatives brought on record as respondents 7 to 9 and third respondent recorded as legal representative; amended grounds and listing after four weeks directed.

Seeniammal Vs Pandiyan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

C.M.P.Nos.10056 & 10058 of 2026 in S.A.No.1200 of 2006

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.06.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶6

C .M.P.Nos .10056 & 10058 of 2026 in S.A.No.1200 of 2006

¶7

Seeniammal (Died)

¶8

2.Chandrasekaran

¶9

S/o.Pitchaiyan

¶10

3.Lakshmanan (Died)

¶11

4.Malarkodi

¶12

W/o.Annamalai

¶13

5.Rameswari

¶14

W/o.Madhavan

¶15

6.Thangarasu Kandiyar S/o.Karuthakannu

¶16

7.Murugesan (Died)

¶17

8.Jeevitha W/o.Murugesan

¶18

9.Minor Akash S/o.Late Murugesan

¶19

10.Minor Archana Sree

¶20

S/o.Late Murugesan ... Petitioners in both the Petitions (Minors represented by their Mother & Natural Guardian Mrs.Jeevitha)

¶21

... Petitioners in both the Petitions

¶22

..Vs..

¶23

Pandian (Died)

¶24

2.Rajendran S/o.Rathinavel Vandiyar

¶25

3.Koothayee Ammal W/o.Rathinavel Vandiyar

¶26

4.Revathy W/o.Lakshmanan

¶27

1/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.M.P.Nos.10056 & 10058 of 2026 in S.A.No.1200 of 2006

¶30

5.Rangarajan S/o.Lakshmanan 6.Chitraselvi D/o.Lakshmanan 7.Latha W/o.Pandian 8.Mohanraj S/o.Pandiyan 9.Deepa S/o.Pandiyan ...Respondents in both the petitions

¶31

PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to bring on record the respondents 7 to 9 herein, who are the legal representatives of the first respondent, as respondents 7 to 9 in the above second appeal and to record 3^rd respondent, who is the legal representative of the deceased first respondent in the above Second Appeal, respectively.

¶32

For Petitioners : Mrs.R.Meenal For Respondents : Mr.S.KasiRajan for RR2 & 3 RR4 to 6 – No Appearance *******

¶33

ORDER

¶34

These applications are filed to record bring on record respondents 7

¶35

to 9, who are legal representatives of the deceased first respondent, as respondents 7 to 9 in the above second appeal and to record the third respondent, as the legal representative of the deceased first respondent in the above second appeal.

¶36

2/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.M.P.Nos.10056 & 10058 of 2026 in S.A.No.1200 of 2006

¶39

2 Both the applications are ordered accordingly.

¶40

3 Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to file an

¶41

amended copy of memorandum of grounds of appeal.

¶42

4 List the appeal after four weeks.

¶43

05.06.2026

¶44

cgi

¶45

Note: Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendment in the cause title.

¶46

3/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

C.M.P.Nos.10056 & 10058 of 2026 in

S.A.No.1200 of 2006

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

cgi

C.M.P.Nos.10056 & 10058 of 2026 in S.A.No.1200 of 2006

¶53

05.06.2026

¶54

4/4

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Seeniammal v. Pandiyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seeniammal v. Pandiyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.v.Thiyagarajan Vs Guthi Govindarajulunaidu(Died)

R.Karthick Vs Mrs. Sivakumar

Dr.Vijaya Rani, I.a.S., Vs High Court of Madras

Govindakudi Appakutty Ayyar Charity Vs v.Mohanachandran, IAS and 2 others

Chinnappaiya Nainar @ Chinnath Vs Annamalai

M. Rajkamal Vs M. Prathap, I.a.S., and 3 others