Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against a Family Court, Chengalpattu order. Counsel withdrew vakalat; appellant unrepresented on the dismissal listing. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.No.2125 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
C.M.A.No.2125 of 2019
R.Chandrasekar ... Appellant
Versus
V.R.Shivasankarai @ Divyameri ... Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 19 of Family Court
Act against order dated 01.10.2018 made in F.C.I.D.O.P.No.115 of 2016 on
the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Ms.G.Devi
1/3
C.M.A.No.2125 of 2019
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J .)
When the matter was listed on 1812.2025, learned counsel for the
appellant has filed a memo dated 18.12.2025 stating that despite several attempts, he could not contact the appellant and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the Vakalat. The said memo was recorded and the matter was directed to be listed today (22.01.2026) under the caption “For Dismissal’ by printing the name of the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption “For Dismissal” by printing the name of the appellant.
[N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 22.01.2026
Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes gpa To
The Family Court, Chengalpattu
2/3
C.M.A.No.2125 of 2019 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J., AND R. SAKTHIVEL, J.,
gpa
C.M.A.No.2125 of 2019
22.01.2026
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Chandrasekar
V.R.Shivasankarai @ Divyameri
N.Sathish Kumar
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
