Dismissed
Arumugam v. Subramaniyan
Madras HCAS(MD)/66/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal suit filed under Section 96 of CPC for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant and lack of representation on the date of hearing and the prior listing date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 10.03.2026
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI
¶6
A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2406 of 2025
¶7
Arumugam
¶8
.. Appellant
¶9
Vs.
¶10
- 1.Subramaniyan
¶11
- 2.Sivagurunathan
¶12
- 3.Vasantha @ Vasanthalakshmi
¶13
- 4.Nagalakshmi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Arumugam
- respondent
Sumathi
- respondent
Sundaresan
- respondent
Mythili @ Krishnaveni
- respondent
Senthilkumar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court