Dismissed¶26

Sulthania Sunnath Jamath Masjid v. a.S.Ismail

Madras HC25 Jun 2026AS/88/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural dismissal of Appeal Suit AS No. 88 of 2019 (High Court of Judicature at Madras, R. Kalaimathi, J., dated 25-06-2026) for non-prosecution - appellants Sulthania Sunnath Jamath Masjid (through Mutawalli A.J.Ziaudeen) and A.J.Ziaudeen absent, counsel reported no instructions; respondents 2-5 (A.S.Sirajudeen, A.S.Kaleel, A.S.Jafar Ali, A.I.Syed Mohammed) represented by T.M.Hariharan; appeal against decree in O.S.No.628 of 2006, Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore; earlier dismissal against R1 (A.S.Ismail) by order dated 03.02.2026; no costs; no ratio on merits.

What did the court decide?

Since none appeared for the appellants on the hearing date while respondents 2-5 were represented through their counsel, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no costs. ¶26

Sulthania Sunnath Jamath Masjid Vs a.S.Ismail — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

AS No. 88 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI

¶6

AS No. 88 of 2019

¶7

Sulthania Sunnath Jamath Masjid Rep By Its Mutawalli A.J.Ziaudeen, D.No.4 Old Pallivasal Street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore 642 104

¶8

A.J.Ziaudeen S/o Abdul Jamel Ravuthor D.No.39 Mariamman Coil Street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Tk, Coimbatore 642 104

¶9

..Appellant(s)

¶10

¶11

A.S.Ismail S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED, D.NO.8 MARIAMMAL KOVIL STREET, RICE GODWON, ANAIMALAI. Appeal is dismissed against R1, vide court order dated 03.02.2026 in AS.No.88/2019 (ADMCJ)

¶12

A.S.Sirajudeen S/o Late Syed Mogammed, D.No.29 Old Pallivasal Street, Anaimalai

¶13

A.S.Kaleel S/o Late Syed Mohammed D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai.

¶14

A.S.Jafar Ali S/o Late Syed Mohammed, D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai.

¶15

A.I.Syed Mohammed S/o Late Syed Mohammed, D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai.

¶16

..Respondent(s)

¶17

__________ Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

AS No. 88 of 2019

¶20

Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil

¶21

Procedure r/w order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 18-01-2018 passed in O.S.No.628 of 2006 on the file of Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

¶22

For Appellant(s): No Appearance For Respondent 2 to 5: Mr.T.M.Hariharan

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

When the matter came up for hearing on 23.06.2026, the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions for the appellants. Necessary endorsement has been made in the Memorandum of Appeal by the learned counsel and Registry was directed to delete the name of the counsel for the appellants and print the name of the appellants in the cause list.

¶25