Dismissed¶22

A. Indrani v. T. Shaddan

Madras HC2 Jan 2026AS/243/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AS No. 243 of 2018; Madras High Court; N. Sathish Kumar and R. Sakthivel JJ.; first appeal under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 Code of Civil Procedure; exparte decree dated 08.11.2017 in O.S.No.300 of 2016, III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram; exparte decree set aside by trial court in I.A.No.25 of 2022, order dated 17.03.2023; appeal dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected CMP.No.4231 of 2018 closed; appellants include minors represented by mother/guardian S. Indrani; respondents led by T. Shaddan.

What did the court decide?

None; appeal dismissed as infructuous with no costs and connected miscellaneous petition (CMP.No.4231 of 2018) closed. ¶22

A. Indrani Vs T. Shaddan — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

AS No. 243 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶6

AS No. 243 of 2018 and CMP.No.4231 of 2018

¶7

A. Indrani 2.Minor S. Pavaridhdhu D/o. T. Shaddan 3.Minor S. Mahind Rana S/o. T. Shaddan Appellants 2 and 3 being minors are rep by next friend/guardian Mother S.Indrani, the 1st appellant

¶8

Appellant(s)

¶9

¶10

T. Shaddan 2.K. Sivasubramaniam 3.K. Nataraj 4.M. Sathish Kumar 5.M. Veeraswamy 6.G. Jailakshmi 7.J. Maheswari Respondent(s)

¶11

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 08/11/2017 made in OS No 300/2016 on the file of the IIIrd Additional District and Sessions

¶12

Judge, Dharapuram.

¶13

For Appellant(s): Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja For Respondent(s): M/s.D.R.Arun Kumar for R1 No appearance for R2 to R7

¶14

ORDER

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

AS No. 243 of 2018

¶17

(Judgement was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

¶18

Challenge has been made in this appeal to the exparte decree dated

¶19

08.11.2017 passed in O.S.No.300 of 2016 on the file of the learned III

¶20

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapurram.

¶21

The learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the very exparte decree itself has been set aside by the Trial Court in I.A.No.25 of 2022 in O.S.No.300 of 2016 by order dated 17.03.2023, therefore, nothing survives in the appeal. Copy of the order dated 17.03.2023 is also placed before this Court.

¶22

Such view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal and this appeal accordingly stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶23

[N.S.K.J] [R.S.V.J]

¶24

02.01.2026

¶25

dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

AS No. 243 of 2018

¶28

¶29