Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd. v. Sunitha Tintu
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Arb Appln No. 564 of 2026, K.Kumaresh Babu J., 17.06.2026. Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim measure; Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules; Judges Summons; appointment of party receiver who is employee of applicant (Branch Legal Manager Harikrishnan S); vehicle loan repossession/seizure of Mahindra Bolero Pick Up KL34H9162; Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited v. Sunitha Tintu; loan agreement dated 25.09.2023; EMI default; respondent set ex parte; prima facie case; police aid protocol (SHO, break open lock, counter sign, Superintendent of Police); return of asset on payment of dues; asset dealt with subject to arbitral award; application disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed in effect: Mr.Harikrishnan S, Branch Legal Manager (applicant's employee), appointed as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the Mahindra Bolero Pick Up (Regn. No.KL34H9162) from the respondent or wherever found, with police assistance and break-open powers subject to safeguards; asset to be returned if unpaid installments/dues are made good, and to be dealt with only subject to the arbitral award.