Tata Capital Ltd. v. Priya Chandrasekar
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – S.9 interim measure
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; Arb Appln No.1637 of 2025; decided 12.01.2026 by Justice N. Anand Venkatesh. Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim relief; Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules; appointment of receiver to seize financed asset on borrower default; recall notice dated 17.10.2025 unanswered; ex parte receiver appointment after service and non-appearance of respondent; seizure with police aid and breaking open premises; applicant: Tata Capital Limited (counsel N.K. Vanan); respondent: Priya Chandra Sekar; asset: Maruti Swift ZXI+ / 'Construction Equipment', Regn. No.TN11AR6026.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr.Abish DJ, Legal Manager, as Court receiver, permitted to seize the Construction Equipment from the respondents or wherever found, breaking open the premises if required, with police assistance. ¶32