Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Kereem Thaleki the Proprietor Ever Green Traders

¶1

Arb Appln No. 163 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb Appln No. 163 of 2026

¶5

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, ‘Chola Crest’, C54-55 & Super B–4, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032, Represented by its Authorised Signatory.

¶6

..Petitioner(s)

¶7

Vs

¶8

Kereem Thaleki The Proprietor Ever Green Traders S/o.Mohammad Thaleki, VGP 11/161, B, Guvedapadpu, Vorkady, Manjeswar, Masjid Kasaragod, Kerala 671 323.

¶9

..Respondent(s)

¶10

Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Ms.Anupama Balakrishnan, Legal Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary.

¶11

For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar For Respondent(s): No appearance

¶12

Page1 of 5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Arb Appln No. 163 of 2026

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This application has been filed to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Ms.Anupama Balakrishnan, Legal Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises.

¶17

2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant had provided a loan to the respondent for the purchase of the aforesaid vehicle and also a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondent with the applicant on 27.07.2023. He would contend that there is some unremained installments that are to be made by the respondent and that in spite of repeated demands, the respondent had failed to regularize the default and had continued to not pay the EMIs. He would further submit that considering the facts of the case, the applicant had sought for an appointment of a party receiver which would be more effective.

¶18

3. In spite of notice having been effected on the respondent, the respondent had neither chosen to appear before this Court in person nor is being

¶19

Page2 of 5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Arb Appln No. 163 of 2026

¶22

represented by a counsel. The name of the respondent has been reflected in the cause-list. He was called absent and set ex parte .

¶23

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶24

5. This Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Party Receiver. It is to be noted that the arbitral proceedings had been initiated and that the award had also been passed on 19.05.2026.

¶25

6. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied with the prayer sought for in this application and in fine, Ms.Anupama balakrishnan, is appointed as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the TATA Signa 1923, Chassis No.MAT778010P2G17922, Engine No.B56B62220D01132G63932527 and bearing Registration No.KA19AE2867 from the respondent or any place belonging to the respondent or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found. It is also made clear that if police help is required, the Party Receiver shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Party

¶26

Page3 of 5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Arb Appln No. 163 of 2026

¶29

Receiver to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required, the Party Receiver shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the

¶30

premises. If the Party Receiver finds any difficulty with the jurisdictional police, s h e is at liberty to approach Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to her at the time of seizure of the vehicle.

¶31

7. If the respondent make good the unpaid installments or makes substantial payments of the dues to be paid to the satisfaction of the applicant, the applicant shall return the asset in the condition it was re-possessed.

¶32

8. With the above terms, this application stands allowed.

¶33

04-06-2026

¶34

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶35

Maya

¶36

__________ Page4 of 5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis