Dismissed¶20

Schenker India Private Limited v. J.K .Apparels

Madras HC7 Apr 2026APPEAL(CAD)/18/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Settlement-based dismissal of a commercial appellate matter before the Madras High Court: Schenker India Private Limited v. J.K Apparels (Proprietor D.Ramesh Kumar); appeal against judgment and decree dated 25-09-2025 of Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai in COS.No.944 of 2022; parties signed joint memorandum of compromise; appeal dismissed as settled out of Court with no order as to costs; CMP.No.4402 of 2026 closed; Court fee refund granted per applicable Rules; statutes referenced: Section 13(1-A) Commercial Courts Act 2015, Section 96 CPC 1908; decision date 07-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

Refund of Court fees to the appellants as per the applicable Rules; joint memorandum of compromise to form part of the judgment; connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶20

Schenker India Private Limited Vs J.K .Apparels — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPEAL(CAD) No. 18 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

APPEAL (CAD) No.18 of 2026 and CMP.No.4402 of 2026

¶7

Schenker India Private Limited Registered Office at 217, Second Floor, Vardhaman Crown Mall, Plot No 02, LSC, Sector-19, Dwaraka, New Delhi- 110075.

¶8

Schenker India Private Limited, Regional office at 42, North Phase Industrial Estate, Ekattuthangal, Chennai- 600032, Tamil Nadu.

¶9

..Appellants

¶10

¶11

J.K .Apparels Rep by its Proprietor D.Ramesh Kumar, No.1B, Padmavathypuram, Avinashi Road, Tiruppur - 641 603.

¶12

..Respondent

¶13

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 r/w Section 96 of the CPC, 1908 praying to set aside the judgement and decree dated 25-09-2025 passed in COS.No.944 of 2022, on the file of the Honble District Judge, Principal Commercial Court at Egmore, Chennai.

¶14

__________ Page1 of 3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

APPEAL(CAD) No. 18 of 2026

¶17

For Appellants: Mr.Rahul Balakrishnan For Respondent: Ms.T.Surekha for Mr.P.Srinivas

¶18

Judgment (Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN,J.)

¶19

The learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondent represented that the parties have entered into a memorandum of compromise. The appellant and the respondent, who are present before this Court today, also stated that they have gone through the terms of settlement and have signed the joint memorandum of compromise.

¶20

Since the matter has been settled between the parties, the present appeal stands dismissed as settled out of Court. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

The joint memorandum of compromise and settlement filed on behalf

¶22

of the appellants and the respondent shall form part this judgment. Since the matter is settled out of Court, the appellants are entitled for refund of the Court fees, as per the applicable Rules.

¶23

(P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 07-04-2026

¶24

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order hvk

¶25

__________ Page2 of 3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

APPEAL(CAD) No. 18 of 2026

¶28

P.VELMURUGAN,J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.