The Commissioner v. v.Mani
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, decision dated 05-02-2026; W.A.No.64 of 2026 and CMP.No. 666 of 2026. Coram: R. Suresh Kumar J. (judgment authored) with Shamim Ahmed J. Appellant: The Commissioner, Salem Corporation, Salem – 636 001. Respondents: V.Mani, S/o.Venkatachalam; The Government of Tamil Nadu (Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department), Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009; The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. Counsel: N.Devi for appellant; P.Kannakumar for Respondent 1; R.Neethiperumal, Government Advocate, for Respondents 2 and 3. Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P.No.21396 of 2015 dated 02.07.2025. Dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No precedents cited; no issues decided.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (CMP.No. 666 of 2026) closed.