Allowed¶23

Vidhya Rani v. Muthulakshmi

Impleadment of plaintiff – Personality rights

Madras HC16 Feb 2026A/5850/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Personality rights of late K.M.Veerappan; impleadment application by second daughter of plaintiff; applicant held to be at least a proper party; no objection by plaintiff's counsel; amendment of plaint to add second plaintiff; Madras High Court, Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J.; A.No.5850 of 2025 in C.S(Comm.Div)No.241 of 2025; order dated 16.02.2026; commercial division suit.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed as prayed for: applicant Vidhya Rani impleaded as second plaintiff in C.S(Comm.Div)No.241 of 2025, with the plaintiff directed to carry out the amendment in the plaint adding her as second plaintiff. ¶23

Vidhya Rani Vs Muthulakshmi — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.No.5850 of 2025

¶2

in C.S(Comm.Div)No.241 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 16.02.2026

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

A.No.5850 of 2025

¶8

in C.S(Comm.Div)No.241 of 2025

Vidhya Rani

... Applicant

vs.

1.Muthulakshmi

2.M/s.VK Productions rep. By Mr.Nirmal Saravanaraj, No.32, First Street, VRS Nagar, Maduravoyal, Chennai – 600 085. … Respondents

¶14

For Applicant : Mr.Kalyan Kishen Singh R For Respondents : Ms.Swetha Sridhar

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The suit was instituted for protection of the alleged personality rights of the late K.M.Veerappan. The second daughter of the plaintiff has applied to be impleaded as second plaintiff in the suit.

¶17