Allowed¶24

Trivitron Healthcare Private Limited v. Mr. Marimuthu Narayanan

Madras HC22 Jan 2026A/257/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A No. 257 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Madras, order dated 22-01-2026 by Justice P. Dhanabal. Applicant/plaintiff: Trivitron Healthcare Private Limited (represented by authorised signatory P.Sridharan), counsel Thriyambak J.Kannan; respondent/defendant: Marimuthu Narayanan. Subject: application for leave to sue defendants 3 to 6 residing outside the Court's jurisdiction in a suit for permanent injunction and damages, on the basis that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Madras jurisdiction; application allowed, leave granted as prayed for, Registry to number the suit if otherwise in order.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to the applicant/plaintiff to sue respondents/defendants 3 to 6 before this Court; the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. ¶24

Trivitron Healthcare Private Limited Vs Mr. Marimuthu Narayanan — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A No. 257 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

A No. 257 of 2026

¶7

Trivitron Healthcare Private LimitedRepresented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.P.Sridharan, Trivitron Sapthagiri Bhavan, No.15 IV Street, Abhiramapuram, Chennai 600 018.

¶8

..Applicant(s)

¶9

¶10

Mr. Marimuthu NarayananS/o.Mr.Narayanan, No.475, HIG Plot 2nd Main Road, Mogappair Eri Scheme, Chennai 600 037

¶11

..Respondent(s)

¶12

Grant leave to the Applicant/Plaintiff to sue the Respondent/Defendant Nos.3 to 6 before this Honble Court herein. For Applicant(s): M/s.Thriyambak J.Kannan For Respondent(s):

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff to grant leave to sue the respondents / defendants 3 to 6.

¶15

According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit and filed the suit for permanent injunction and for damages. The cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court, however the defendants 3 to 6 are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court and the suit can be instituted before this Court. The main prayer is for permanent injunction,

¶16

__________Page 1 of 3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

A No. 257 of 2026

¶19

thereby the suit can also be filed before this Court. Therefore, the plaintiff filed

¶20

this present petition.

¶21

This Court heard petitioner side and perused the records.

¶22

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit that the respondents /

¶23

defendants 3 to 6 are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court and that substantial part of cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court, and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to allow this application and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for.

¶24