Allowed¶24

The Sub Registrar v. T.Krishna Kumar and 3 others

Madras HC24 Jun 2026A/2357/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 304-day delay in filing Written Statement; application allowed; no costs; applicant D3 Sub Registrar Purasawalkam Sub Registrar Office; suit CS No. 43 of 2025; plaintiff's counsel no objection with endorsement; Madras High Court; Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete; order dated 24-06-2026; interlocutory civil application.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 304 days in filing the Written Statement condoned; the application is allowed with no costs. ¶24

The Sub Registrar Vs T.Krishna Kumar and 3 others — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.No.2357 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

A No. 2357 of 2026 IN CS NO. 43 OF 2025

¶7

The Sub Registrar Purasawalkam Sub Registrar Office, No.6/13, Adhi Venu Heights, Porteous Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai-600023

¶8

..Applicant(s)

¶9

¶10

T.Krishna Kumar S/o.Late. R.Thyagarajan and Late.T.Mohana Sundari alias T.Elamathi, No.9/5, 1st Floor, Flat D, Devaraj Street, Perambur Barracks, Chennai-600 012

¶11

T.Vijaya Kumar S/o.Late.R.Thyagarajan and Late.T.Mohana Sundarai alias T.Elamathi, No.11/44, First Street, Sornambikai Nagar, Virugambakkam, Chennai-600 092

¶12

S.Rajalakshmi W/o.P.Saravanan, D/o.Late. R.Thyagarajan and Late.T.Mohana Sundari alias T.Elamathi, N.4/23, 10th Cross Street, Indra Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020

¶13

1/3

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

A.No.2357 of 2026

¶16

M.N.Gurunathan S/o.M.Natarajan, No.14/28, Solai Amman Koil Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai-600 007

¶17

..Respondent(s)

¶18

PRAYER: To condone the delay of 304 days in filing the Written Statement.

¶19

For Applicant(s): Mr.Karthik Selvaraj, Government Advocate. For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Prabhakaran for R1 & R2.

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This application has been filed by D3 to condone the delay of 304 days in filing the Written Statement.

¶22

2.When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has received the copy of the written statement and has not got any reply to be filed and has got no objection in allowing this application and has made an endorsement to that effect.

¶23

3.Accordingly, considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support

¶24

of this application, this application is allowed. No costs.

¶25

24-06-2026

¶26

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AY 2/3

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

A.No.2357 of 2026