Daya Srinivasan v. Nirmala Krishnaswamy and 3 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court order dated 24-07-2026 (Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete) in A No. 2193 of 2026 in CS No. 228 of 2004. Amendment-of-plaint application (Order XIV Rule 8 O.S. Rules; Order VI Rule 17 and Section 151 CPC) by Daya Srinivasan against Nirmala Krishnaswamy, Kala Doraisamy, M/s. P.A. Construction and Palanisamy Apartment Owner's Association, seeking to add a prayer for partition by metes and bounds and separate possession of the 1st plaintiff's 1/3rd share in plaint schedule D property, with valuation of the new prayer at Rs. 3,99,08,000 under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1965 and court fee of Rs. 10,000. Dismissed as withdrawn on the applicant's request following an agreed settlement between the parties with endorsement; no merits decided; no precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed as withdrawn: when taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw it because the parties had agreed for settlement and had made an endorsement to that effect.