Allowed¶23

Jayanthi Kannappan v. Dr.G.v.Varadarajulu

Madras HC9 Jan 2026A/175/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condone delay 4 days; representation of application D.No.54012 of 2025; reopen case and recall witness; Order XIV Rule 10(1) OS Rule; Section 5 Limitation Act; Section 151 CPC; Madras High Court; P. Dhanabal; C.S.No.182 of 2023; application allowed; listed 23.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 4-day delay in representing application D.No.54012 of 2025 granted; Registry directed to number that application if otherwise in order; matter listed on 23.01.2026. ¶23

Jayanthi Kannappan Vs Dr.G.v.Varadarajulu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.No.175 of 2026 in C.S.No.182 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

A.No.175 of 2026 in CS No.182 of 2023

¶7

1.Jayanthi Kannappan 2.Lavanya 3.Yamini

¶8

4.Ishwarya 5.Sathappa Srinivasan

¶9

… Applicants

¶10

¶11

G.V.Kamalammal (Deceased) 1.Dr.G.V.Varadarajulu 2 Sekar

¶12

2.Dharmaraya Pillai Thanner Pandal Inam Trust, Rep by J.Dinakaran No.21, Thandavarayan Street, East Gopalapuram, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014. Trustee of 1^st defendant Rep by C.K.Jayaraman Rep by J.Dinakaran

¶13

3.C.K.Jayaraman A.L.S.Kappappan (Deceased) G.V.Manjula (Deceased) 4.G.V.Geetha 5.K.M.Ananatha Krishnan 6.Dipta Balaji 7.Rohit Krishnam ... Respondents

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

A.No.175 of 2026 in C.S.No.182 of 2023

¶17

Prayer : Application filed under Order XIV Rule 10 (1) of OS Rule r.w. Section 5 of Limitation Act r/w. Section 151 of CPC, to condone the delay of 4 days for representing the application D.No.54012 of 2025.

¶18

For Applicants : Mr.P.Anandan

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This application has been filed by the applicant to condone the delay of 4 days for representing the application D.No.54012 of 2025 to reopen the case and recall the witness

¶21

The other side have not seriously objected.

¶22

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and facts and

¶23

circumstances of the case, in order to give a chance to the applicants to put forth their case and considering the number of days in delay, it is appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, this application is allowed.

¶24