Allowed¶21

P. Ramakrishnan v. No Respondent

Madras HC7 Apr 2026A/1101/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, single judge (Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete); A.No.1101 of 2026 in O.P.No.633 of 2025; permission for neurologist Dr. S. Balasubramaniam of Prasanth Hospital to give evidence by video conferencing; guardianship petition under Clause 17 Letters Patent; Order XIV Rule 8 OS Rules; Section 151 CPC; Madras High Court Video Conferencing Rules, 2020; application allowed, no costs; decided 07-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to have Dr. S. Balasubramaniam, Neurologist, tender his evidence through video conferencing in O.P.No.633 of 2025, in accordance with the Madras High Court Video Conferencing Rules, 2020; no costs. ¶21

P. Ramakrishnan Vs No Respondent — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A No. 1101 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

A No. 1101 of 2026 in OP NO. 633 of 2025

¶7

P. Ramakrishnan ..Applicant

¶8

¶9

No Respondent Nil

¶10

Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV, Rule 8 of OS Rules r/w. Section 151 of CPC, praying to permit the Neurologist who examined the petitioners mother, Mr.Rajakumari Pasupathi, to tender his evidence through Video Conferencing in the above O.P.

¶11

For Applicant(s): Mr.N.Senthilkumar

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Heard.

¶14

This application in A.No.1101 of 2026 in O.P.No.633 of 2025 has

¶15

been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to have the neurologist who examined his mother, Mrs. Rajakumari Pasupathi, tender his evidence through video conferencing in the above Original Petition.

¶16

Page1 of 3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

A No. 1101 of 2026

¶19

The petitioner states that the main O.P. has been filed under Clause 17 of the Letters Patent seeking appointment of guardian for his mother, who is suffering from mental illness, and that the treating neurologist, Dr. S. Balasubramaniam of Prasanth Hospital, who issued the medical certificate regarding her condition, is required to depose. It is further stated that, owing to his professional commitments as a consultant neurologist attending to patients, his physical presence before Court may not be readily secured.

¶20

Considering the affidavit and the submissions made, this Court is satisfied that the request is only to facilitate recording of the evidence of the doctor and therefore, the petitioner can be permitted recording of evidence through video conferencing subject to compliance with the Madras High Court Video Conferencing Rules, 2020

¶21

Accordingly A.No.1101 of 2026 is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to have Dr. S. Balasubramaniam, Neurologist, tender his evidence through video conferencing in O.P.No.633 of 2025, in accordance with the Madras High Court Video Conferencing Rules, 2020. No costs.

¶22

07-04-2026

¶23

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRM

¶24

__________ Page2 of 3

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

A No. 1101 of 2026

¶27

DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.