Dismissed¶27

The Director of Matrlculation Schools v. S.S.M Lakshmiammal Matric Higher Secondary School

Madras HC19 Jun 2026/109/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application dismissed - Madras High Court - REV.APLW No. 109 of 2026 - Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 CPC - review of order dated 02.04.2024 in W.P. No. 10465/2023 - Tamil Nadu Private Schools Fee Determination Committee - fee enhancement proceedings dated 29.11.2022 - no error apparent on face of record - Director of Matriculation Schools v. S.S.M Lakshmiammal Matric Higher Secondary School - matriculation school fee fixation - no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the Review Application is dismissed with no costs. ¶27

The Director of Matrlculation Schools Vs S.S.M Lakshmiammal Matric Higher Secondary School — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

REV.APLW No. 109 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶8

REV.APLW No. 109 of 2026

¶9

The Director of Matriculation Schools DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶10

Private Schools Fee Determination Committee Rep. by its Special Officer, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006

¶11

..Petitioner(s)

¶12

¶13

S.S.M Lakshmiammal Matric Higher Secondary School Rep. by its Correspondent, K.P.E Ravindran, Post Box No. 161, By-Pass Road, Komarapalayam-638 183, Namakkal District.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC to set review the order dated 02.04.2024 made in W.P. No. 10465/2023 and thus render justice.

¶16

For Petitioner(s): Mr.M Babu Barveez For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Neduchezhiyan

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

¶19

The present review petition has been mainly filed on the ground

¶20

that the Tamil Nadu Private Schools Fee Determination Committee

¶21

Page1 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

REV.APLW No. 109 of 2026

¶24

issued proceedings dated 29.11.2022 enhancing the fee to be collected.

¶25

Once again, the respondent School approached the Committee

¶26

and the fee structure was enhanced. That being so, further revision pursuant to the order sought to be review may not arise. However, all these aspects are to be considered while implementing the orders of this

¶27

Court. However, such a ground may not constitute for reviewing the order as it cannot be considered as an error apparent. Thus, the Review Application is dismissed. No costs.

¶28

(S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 19-06-2026

¶29

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶30

VSI

¶31

__________ Page2 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

REV.APLW No. 109 of 2026