Velmurugan K v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Maintainability of writ petition; Article 226 mandamus; tenancy dispute; writ jurisdiction cannot be used as rent control remedy; closure of butcher shop after municipal and food safety licence cancellations (25.02.2022 and 18.11.2022); unlawful occupant; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Urban Local Body Act; Dindigul Municipal Corporation. Result: W.P.(MD) No.9911 of 2025 dismissed; connected W.M.P(MD) No.7377 of 2025 closed; no costs. Bench: S. Srimathy, J.; decided 09.06.2025. No precedents cited; no costs awarded; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner, being the owner of the land with a subsisting tenancy dispute with the 5th respondent, has converted the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India into rent control jurisdiction, which cannot be entertained; hence the writ petition is dismissed.