Samboornam v. Superintending Engineer (Operation and Maintenance)
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(MD)No.9570 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 07.04.2025 by Vivek Kumar Singh, J. Petitioner Samboornam v. TNPDCL officials (Superintending Engineer, Karur; Executive Engineer, Kulithalai; Assistant Engineer, Mayanoor). Mandamus sought for new electricity service connection based on representation dated 24.02.2025 after application of 31.01.2025 went unacted upon. Disposed at admission stage: statutory authority must consider representations on merits; non-consideration is dereliction of duty; third respondent directed to decide within two months; no view on merits; no costs. Counsel: V.Kannan (petitioner); S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel (respondents).
What did the court decide?
Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.02.2025 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; no order as to costs.