Partly allowed

M/s. Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India

Madras HC14 Oct 2025WP(MD)/8785/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions filed by a petroleum corporation challenging a Central Tax Notification and a Show Cause Notice. The court dismissed the declaration prayer as not pressed while disposing of the notice quashing petition by allowing a response.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for declaration dismissed as not pressed. Show Cause Notice petition dismissed; liberty granted to file response within four weeks.

M/s. Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd… — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 14.10.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶5

W.P.(MD) No. 8785 and 8786 of 2020

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8065 and 8066 of 2020

¶8

M/s. Southern Petrochemicals

¶9

Industries Corporation Ltd.,

¶10

Represented by its Chief Financial Officer, Mr.K R Anandan, SPIC Nagar, Muthiapuram, Tuticorin - 628 005

¶11

... Petitioner in both petitions

¶12

¶13

1.Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi -110 001.

¶14

2.The Joint Commissioner,

¶15

Office of the Joint Commissioner GST and CE Central Revenue Building, Tractor Road, N.G.O. A Colony, Tirunelveli.

¶16

...Respondents in both petitions

¶17

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.8785 of 2020: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

of Declaration, declaring the Entry 2(iii) of Notification No. 26/2018C.T. dated 13th June, 2018 issued by the 1st respondent herein as illegal and ultra vires the constitution of India insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

¶21

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.8785 of 2020: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the Show Cause Notice No. 01/GST/JC/ 2019 dated 17.10.2019 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of the principles of natural justice.

¶22

In both petitions:

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthuvenkataraman For Respondents : Mr.P.Murali [R1] Mr.N.Dilip Kumar [R2] Standing Counsel

¶24

COMMON ORDER

¶25

(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

¶26

Learned counsel on record for the petitioner does not press the prayer for declaration in W.P.(MD)No.8785 of 2020, wherein the challenge is to Entry 2(iii) of Notification No.26/2018-C.T., dated 13.06.2018 with liberty to put forth all their submissions before the authority adjudicating show cause notice No.01/GST/JC/2019 dated

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

17.10.2019. An endorsement is made to this effect, which is recorded.

¶30

Hence, W.P.(MD)No.8785 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed.

¶31

2.W.P.(MD)No.8786 of 2020 is dismissed permitting the

¶32

petitioner to file its response to the show cause notice within a period of four weeks from date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that nothing contained in this order will stand in the way of the petitioner in making its case before the adjudicating authority. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶33

[A.S.M., J.] [C.K., J.] 14.10.2025

¶34

NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes ta

¶35

3/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

¶38

¶39

W.P.(MD)Nos.8785 and 8786 of 2020

¶40

14.10.2025

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s. Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Periyasamy Vs the Secretary

M/S.Tvs Srichakra Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/S. L S Mills Limited Vs Union of India

M. Kalaiselvi, Vs the District Elementary

M/S. Greenstar Fertilizers Ltd., Vs Union of India

Namasivayam Vs The District Collector