Dismissed

A.Muniyasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC28 Mar 2025WP(MD)/8763/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Son sought mandamus for six days emergency leave without escort for his life-convict father to attend the mother's first-year death anniversary ceremony and repair his house. The prison authorities had already considered and rejected the representation since the rules do not permit leave for death anniversary ceremonies. The writ petition was dismissed as nothing remained to adjudicate.

What the court decided

AI extract

A.Muniyasamy Vs The Superintendent of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED : 28 .03.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶5

W.P(MD)No.8763 of 2025

A.Muniyasamy

... Petitioner

.Vs.

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District. ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant six days emergency leave without escort to his father namely Andivel(Life Convict Prisoner No.3200),son of Kamatchi, aged about 65 years, who is confined at Madurai Central Prison for performing his mother’s First year Death Anniversary Pooja Ceremony on 1.4.2025 and for repair work to the damaged house under Rule 6 of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 by considering the Petitioner’s representation, dated 18.3.2025 in accordance with law.

¶11

1/5

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prakash For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J AND R.POORNIMA.,J

¶16

This Writ Petition is filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant six days emergency leave without escort to his father namely Andivel(Life Convict Prisoner No. 3200),son of Kamatchi, aged about 65 years, who is confined at Madurai Central Prison for performing his mother’s First year Death Anniversary Pooja Ceremony on 1.4.2025 and for repair work to the damaged house under Rule 6 of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 by considering the Petitioner’s representation, dated 18.3.2025 in accordance with law.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶18

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-Police

¶19

2/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

states that the said request of the Petitioner was duly considered by the Prison Authorities and rejected on 27.03.2025, since the prison rules does not permit emergency leave for attending the anniversary death ceremonies.

¶22

4.Taking note of the fact that the Petitioner’s representation

¶23

has been duly considered and rejected by the Prison Authorities, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.

¶24

[G.J.,J.] [R.P.,J.] 28.03.2025

¶25

NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No vsn To

¶26

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.

¶27

3/5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

4/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and R.POORNIMA ,J.

¶32

vsn

¶33

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.P(MD)No.8763 of 2025

¶34

28.03.2025

¶35

5/5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Muniyasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A.Muniyasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Raja Vs M.Logeshwaran

V.Rajapandian Vs The Indian Bank

The State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Secretary Vs S Daniel Raja Singh

Boopathy Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Gurmukh Singh Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Vinoth Vs The Inspector of Police