5. Before this Court, the petitioner has not produced any clinching / conclusive evidence to prove that the fifth respondent had submitted bogus certificates for the purpose of getting appointed as a handball coach. The official respondents have also stated through their respective counters that the fifth respondent had submitted only genuine certificates to enable the fifth respondent to get appointed as a handball coach. When there is no clinching / conclusive evidence placed on record by the petitioner to prove that the fifth respondent had secured employment as a handball coach by furnishing bogus documents and that too, when the official respondents have themselves not admitted the contention of the petitioner, the question of entertaining this Writ Petition does not arise, since there are disputed questions of facts and law involved and that too, when there is no clinching / conclusive to prove that the fifth respondent has submitted bogus certificates, this Court does not find any merit in this Writ Petition.