Sudarshan Vinayak R v. The Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal as withdrawn / infructuous writ petition. W.P.(MD). No.7213 of 2023, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 12/02/2025 by K.R.Shriram, C.J. (order made by the Chief Justice) and V.Lakshminarayanan, J. Petitioner R.Sudarshan Vinayak (counsel Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj) had prayed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for certiorarified mandamus to quash the order of The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Tallakulam, Madurai (counsel Mr.F.Deepak) in Ref.DN/1012651028166/2022-23 dated 27.01.2023 and to direct rescheduling of the loan. Counsel stated the petition had become infructuous; the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without costs and closed connected W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6803, 6804, 7962, 7963 and 7964 of 2023. No cases cited, no statutes other than Article 226, no monetary award, no adjudication of the impugned bank order.
What did the court decide?
After counsel for the petitioner declared that the writ petition had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, awarding no costs. The substantive question raised in the petition was not adjudicated.