Dismissed¶26

K.Mathi v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC18 Aug 2025WP(MD)/6735/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal with endorsement; no costs; writ of mandamus; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; approval of appointment; G.O.Ms.No.181 dated 15.11.2011; representations dated 24.12.2012, 27.03.2013 and 29.03.2013; District Education Officer, Madurai; Director of School Education; Chief Education Officer, Madurai; Department of School Education, Tamil Nadu; Arulmigu Aandavar Subramaniasamy Girls Higher Secondary School, Thiruparangundram; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; W.P.(MD)No.6735 of 2013; decided 18.08.2025; bench G.R.Swaminathan and K.Rajasekar, JJ.; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

None; leave to withdraw the petition was sought by learned counsel for the petitioner with an endorsement, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs. ¶26

K.Mathi Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.6735 OF 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶8

W.P.(MD)No.6735 of 2013

¶9

K.Mathi ... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

¶12

The Director of School Education, Chennai – 6.

¶13

The Chief Education Officer, Madurai.

¶14

The District Education Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶15

The Secretary and Correspondent, Arulmigu Aandavar Subramaniasamy, Girls Higher Secondary School, Thiruparangundram, Madurai.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

2 W.P.(MD)NO.6735 OF 2013

¶21

fourth respondent to consider the proposals of the fifth respondent for the approval of the appointment of the petitioner made by him, in the light of G.O.Ms.No.181 dated 15.11.2011 and on the basis of various representations dated 24.12.2012 and 27.03.2013 and 29.03.2013 in accordance with law.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader. For R-5 : Mr.S.Manohar * * *

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to

¶25

withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶26