Writ petition seeking mandamus for removal of encroachment on public place pending with respondents. Court directed official respondents to consider petitioner's representation after hearing parties and pass orders within twelve weeks.
Direction to official respondents to consider representation and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.6482 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2025
C.Rajarajeshwari
... Petitioner
-Vs-
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate action for removal of encroachment made by the individual at public place at Survey
Page 1 of 5
W.P.(MD) No.6482 of 2025
No.467/97 at Vairichettypalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Ms.M.Anbarasi For R1 to R4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Government Pleader
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J. ]
By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
3.Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader, who takes notice on
behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed on its own merits within a period that may be stipulated by this Court.
Page 2 of 5
W.P.(MD) No.6482 of 2025
4.Notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with, since no adverse order is going to be passed as against them.
5.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, we direct the official respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2024 after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private respondents 5 and 6 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[J.N.B., J.] & [S.S.Y., J.] 11.03.2025
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No
Yuva
Page 3 of 5
W.P.(MD) No.6482 of 2025
To
Page 4 of 5
W.P.(MD) No.6482 of 2025
J.NISHA BANU, J. AND S.SRIMATHY, J.
Yuva
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2025
11.03.2025
Page 5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation seeking removal of encroachment on public place should be considered and decided by the official respondents?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Rajarajeshwari
The District Collector, Trichy District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musuri, Trichy District
The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District
The Tahsildar / Taluk Level Monitoring Committee, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District
Poosari Pratap @ Periyakannan
J.NISHA BANU
S.SRIMATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
