Disposed¶25

Indhira Muthalagu, v. the District Collector

Madras HC8 Apr 2025WP(MD)/6099/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous writ petition; encroachment already removed; disposal by consent of both sides; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; WP(MD) No. 6099 of 2019; Pudhukottai District; Tahsildar Thirumayam Taluk; Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Thirumayam; Article 226 Constitution of India; Writ of Certiorari quash; no order as to costs; interim applications closed; K.R. Shriram Chief Justice; P.B. Balaji J.; decided 08.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

On the respondents' statement that the alleged encroachment had already been removed and the petitioner's counsel requesting disposal, the Court disposed of the writ petition, ordered that there shall be no order as to costs, and closed the interim applications. ¶25

Indhira Muthalagu, Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP(MD). No.6099 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date : 08.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

¶7

WP(MD). No.6099 of 2019 and

¶8

WMP(MD). No.4863, 4864 of 2019 & 2366 of 2020

Indhira Muthalagu

... Petitioner

The District Collector, Pudhukottai District, Pudhukottai.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudhukottai District.

¶14

The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Thirumayam, Pudhukottai District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka.No. 985/2019/A8 dated 08.03.2019 issued by the 2^nd respondent and consequential order passed by the 3^rd respondent vide proceeding made in Na.Ka.Thi6/1808/2018 dated 08.03.2019 and quash the same.

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP(MD). No.6099 of 2019

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj For Respondents : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice)

¶23

Mr.Ramachandran states that the encroachment alleged has already been removed and, therefore, nothing would remain in the petition. Mr.Ramachandran says that, therefore, the petition itself has become infructuous.

¶24