Dismissed¶26

R.Ramanujam v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC8 Jan 2025WP(MD)/536/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.536 of 2025; Article 226 mandamus; patta correction 1320 sq.ft. versus 0-1.00 ares (1199 sq.ft./2.45 cents); Patta No.3779; Thirumangalam, Madurai District; representation dated 10.12.2024; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply to the concerned authority; no costs; single-judge order of Mrs. Justice N.MALA dated 08.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the concerned authority for the correction of patta; no costs. ¶26

R.Ramanujam Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.536 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.01.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.536 of 2025

R.Ramanujam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam Sub Division, Madurai District.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar Thirumangalam Taluk Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶12

3.The Head Surveyor, Thirumangalam Tahsildar Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶13

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Kappalur, Thirumangalam Tahsildar Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to correct the extension to 1320 sq.ft. instead of 0-1.00 ares

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 1 of 4_

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.536 of 2025

¶18

i.e. 1199 sq.ft. (2.45 cents) in the petitioner's Patta No.3779 and issue the corrected Patta to the petitioner, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 10.12.2024, within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Muthumari

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader

¶21

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

When this case is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition, with liberty to file an application before the concerned authority

¶24

for the correction of patta. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶25