The Correspondent v. The Director of School Education
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(MD)No.3765 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 05.03.2025 by Battu Devanand, J. Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 by the Correspondent of St.Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Vizhunthayambalam, Kanyakumari District, against the Director of School Education (R1), Chief Educational Officer Nagercoil (R2) and District Educational Officer Marthandam (R3), seeking approval of the appointment of B.Sunitha Kumari as PG Assistant (Physics) made on 01.08.2023 on the retirement-vacancy arising from P.Michael Dominic Brittoon's retirement on 31.07.2023, and grant-in-aid salary/allowances from the date of appointment. Proposal sent 26.02.2024, returned 09.05.2024 for particulars, re-submitted 24.06.2024 and pending. Held: disposed at admission stage without merits; respondents 2 and 3 directed to approve the re-submitted proposal within four weeks per due process and disburse grant-in-aid including all benefits and allowances if legally entitled; no costs; connected W.M.P.(MD)No.2709 of 2025 closed. Statutes: Article 226, Constitution of India; Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860. Counsel: K.Ragatheesh Kumar for petitioner; M.Siddarthan, Additional Government Pleader, for respondents.