Dismissed¶22

N.Senthil v. The Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC19 Dec 2025WP(MD)/36497/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Article 226 writ petition; mandamus sought against registration of documents over Uzhavadai land (S.No.21/6, 4/11A1, 4/8B, 21/2, 4/7A; patta Nos.59 and 18); respondents: Inspector General of Registration, District Registrar Rajakambiram, Sub Registrar Samanatham; representation dated 29.08.2005; counsel's withdrawal endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; connected WMP(MD)No.29058 of 2025 closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; K.K. Ramakrishnan, J.; 19.12.2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

N.Senthil Vs The Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.35329 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.36497 of 2025 and

¶7

WMP(MD)No.29058 of 2025

N.Senthil

... Petitioner

The Inspector General of Registration, Office of Inspector General of Registration, Santhom High Ways Road, Chennai.

¶12

2.The District Registrar, (Registration) Rajakambiram, Othakadai, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶13

3.The Sub Registrar, Samanatham Sub Registrar office, Ayanapuram, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents not to register any document in respect of the petitioner's Uzhavadai land situated in S.No.21/6, 4/11A1, 4/8B, 21/2 and 4/7A in patta No.59 and 18 based on the petitioner's representation dated 29.08.2005.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.35329 of 2025

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman Government Advocate

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶21

Recording the said submission and endorsement made by the

¶22

learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

19.12.2025

dss

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.35329 of 2025

¶28

¶29