Dismissed¶27

Priyadharshni v. The State represented by its

Madras HC7 Feb 2025WP(MD)/3541/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ordinary leave to convict; writ of mandamus; Article 226; wife of detenue; NDPS Act, 1985 conviction (Ss.8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) r/w 29(1), 8(c) r/w 27(A), 8(c) r/w 28 r/w 20(b)(ii)(C)); representation dated 20.12.2024 rejected on 28.01.2025 in Proceedings No.735/Kc/2024; Central Prison Trichy; Convict No.25194; liberty to challenge rejection order; dismissed; no costs; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran; Ms. Justice R. Poornima; W.P.(MD) No.3541 of 2025; decided 07.02.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order dated 28.01.2025 (Proceedings No.735/Kc/2024); no costs. ¶27

Priyadharshni Vs The State represented by its — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.3541 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.02.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.3541 of 2025

¶8

Priyadharshini

¶9

... Petitioner/Wife of the Detenue

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1.The State Represented by its, The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶12

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Trichy Range, Trichy-620 020. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy-620 020. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai-625 007. ... Respondents

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.(MD) No.3541 of 2025

¶16

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 3 months without escort to the detenue, Pandi S/o.Karuppathevar, aged about 43 years, Convict No.25194, confined at Central Prison Trichy.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

[Order of the Court was made by DR. G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. ]

¶20

The writ of Mandamus filed by the wife of Pandi(Convict No.25194)

¶21

to consider her representation dated 20.12.2024 seeking ordinary leave for her husband who was convict for an offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) r/w 29(1), 8(c) r/w 27(A), 8(c) r/w 28 r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, 1985.

¶22

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents states that the representation of the petitioner being duly considered and rejected by the authorities on 28.01.2025 in proceedings No.735/Kc/2024. It is also stated that the copy of the said proceedings served to the said Pandi(Convict No.25194).

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD) No.3541 of 2025

¶26

3.In the light of the above facts, the writ petition seeking mandamus is

¶27

dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order, if so

¶28

adviced. No costs.