Disposed¶19

Thenmozhi v. The Accountant General (a and E)

Madras HC18 Nov 2025WP(MD)/32901/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Family pension; revised scale of family pension; representation dated 29.09.2025; Writ of Mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Accountant General (A and E) Chennai; Chief Education Officer Trichy; consideration of representation within eight weeks; disposal without examining merits; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; Judge K.Kumaresh Babu; order dated 18.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Limited direction granted: the first respondent (Accountant General (A and E)) was directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.09.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within Eight (8) weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no direct direction to pay the revised scale of family pension was issued. ¶19

Thenmozhi Vs The Accountant General (a and E) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP(MD). No.32851 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 18.11.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

WP(MD)No.32901 of 2025

¶7

Thenmozhi ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Accountant General (A And E), No. 361 Annasalai, Teynampeti, Chennai 18

¶10

The Chief Education Officer Office of the Chief Education Officer, Palakarai, Trichy ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.09.2025 and direct the the respondents to pay the revised scale of family pension to the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananda kumar For R1 : Mr.G.Karthick Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP(MD). No.32851 of 2025

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.09.2025 and direct the the respondents to pay the revised scale of family pension to the petitioner.

¶18

Heard the submission of both sides counsel and perused the materials available on record.

¶19

Eventhough the petitioner has sought for a positive direction seeking to direct the respondents to pay the revised scale of family pension to the petitioner by considering her representation dated 29.09.2025, this Court without going into the merits of the claim made in the writ petition, directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.09.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of Eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

18.11.2025

¶21

NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no tta

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

WP(MD). No.32851 of 2025

¶25

TO: