Disposed¶31

Ayyasamy v. The District Collector

Madras HC14 Nov 2025WP(MD)/32676/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ayyasamy v. District Collector & others, W.P(MD)No. 32676 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 14.11.2025 (Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J.). Mandamus sought against Tahsildar, Rajapalayam to implement Sub Collector, Sivakasi order dated 25.11.2024 granting Natham Patta for 1 Acre 80 Cents in Survey No.314/3, Chettiarpatti Village, Virudhunagar District. Court found the 25.11.2024 order unchallenged and in force and directed implementation within eight weeks; petition disposed of with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of on these terms: the Tahsildar directed to implement the Sub Collector's order dated 25.11.2024 (grant of Natham Patta) within eight weeks from receipt of a copy of this order; no costs. ¶31

Ayyasamy Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No. 32676 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 14.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

W.P(MD)No. 32676 of 2025

Ayyasamy

... Petitioner

The District Collector, The Collectorate Office, Virudhunagar District.

¶11

The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

The Sub Collector, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

Tahsildar, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to implement the order passed by the third respondent vide Proceedings No. Ni.Mu.Aa 1/941/2024 dated 25.11.2024 and issue Natham Patta for the land property to an extent of 1 Acre 80 Cents in Survey No.314/3 situated at Chettiarpatti Village, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No. 32676 of 2025

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr. R.Karunanidhi For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The petitioner seeks implementation of the direction issued by the

¶21

Sub Collector on 25.11.2024 to the Tahsildar.

¶22

Learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that the directions would be implemented within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

In the operative paragraph of the order dated 25.11.2024, it is recorded as under:

¶24

“vdNt ,uh[ghisak; tl;lk;> nrl;bahu;gl;b fpuhkk;> ej;jk; Gyvz;> 314/3 (314/3-gh) tp];jPuzk; 0.72.00.0r.kP epyj;jpid gl;lhvz;.3068-y; n[fehjehAL kfd; ma;ahr;rhkp ehAL ngaupy; gjpNtw;wk; nra;aTk; kw;Wk; ej;jk; Gyvz;. 314/4 (314/4-gh) tp];jPuzk; - 0.03.00.0r.kP epyj;jpid gl;lhvz;.3068-y; n[fehjehAL kfd; ma;ahr;rhkp ehAL vd ej;jk; fpuhkf;fzf;fpy;

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P(MD)No. 32676 of 2025

¶28

ngau; jpUj;jk; nra;aTk; ,uh[ghisak; tUtha; tl;lhl;rpaUf;F ,jd; %yk; cj;jutplg;gLfpwJ.”

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order

¶30

was not challenged by any person and is in force as on date. In these circumstances, the Tasildar is directed to implement the order within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31