A.Andrews Vs The District Revenue Officer

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1^st respondent to release the petitioner's vehicle namely TATA Motors / LP 407 Bus bearing Registration NO.KL-19-G-8699 to the petitioner forthwith.

¶12

1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P.(MD).No.31081 of 2024

¶14

For Petitioner	: Mr.Selvakumaran.T
For R-1	: Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate
For R-2	: Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's TATA Motors / LP 407 Bus bearing Registration No.KL-19-G-8699 from the custody of the respondents on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2024.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsels on either sides and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶18

3.The petition-mentioned TATA Motors / LP 407 Bus bearing Registration NO.KL-19-G-8699 was seized in connection of a crime in Crime No.257 of 2024 registered by the 2^nd respondent police for

¶19

2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD).No.31081 of 2024

¶21

illegally transporting 180 liters of white kerosene. The petition mentioned vehicle is presently in the custody of the respondents. It is of course open to the respondent authority to initiate confiscation proceedings. In this case, I am concerned only with the issue of grant of interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner. No purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle under the custody of the police.

¶22

4.This Court has dealt with a similar case in W.P.(MD)No.10134

¶23

of 2024 dated 25.04.2024 and has passed a favourable order to the petitioner therein and the relevant portion of the same is extracted as follows:

¶24

“ 5.... The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Others V.State of Gujarat) has held as follows:-

¶25

17.In our view, whatever be the situation, it

¶26

is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the

¶27

Magistrate to pass appropriate orders

¶28

3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD).No.31081 of 2024

¶30

immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.”

¶31

5.Therefore, the 1^st respondent is directed to grant interim custody

¶32

of the said vehicle subject to the following condition:

¶33

(i) The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) in favour of the Aishwaryam Trust, Indian Bank, Tirunagar Branch, Madurai, Account No.6639017788, IFSC Code: IDIB000T032. It will be a non-refundable payment. The Managing Trustee of the Trust is directed to spend the said amount for the welfare of the inmates of the Trust.

¶34

(ii) The petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle till the proceedings are completed.

¶35

(iii) The petitioner shall produce all the documents pertaining to the ownership of the seized vehicle. If the petitioner is an agreement holder, he can produce the relevant xerox copies.

¶36

4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD).No.31081 of 2024

¶38

(iv) As and when the respondents call for the vehicle for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the vehicle in question and he shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

¶39

(v)Respondents shall file a report under Sec 6(A) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, to the Jurisdictional Collector within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶40

(vi)Owner of the vehicle may be added as an accused in the FIR, if necessary.”

¶41

6.Upon completion of these formalities, the respondents shall grant interim custody of the vehicle forthwith to the petitioner without any delay. If this undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled to interim custody of the vehicle in future.

¶42

7.The writ petition is allowed accordingly. I make it clear that allowing of this writ petition will not have any bearing on the

¶43

5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.(MD).No.31081 of 2024

¶45

confiscation proceedings that may be initiated by the authorities. There

¶46

shall bo no order as to costs.

¶47

23.01.2025