S.Ayisha Kani v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ of mandamus; Article 226; drainage water; rain water; encroachment removal; canal bund; municipal drainage channel; representation dated 03.10.2025; personal hearing to interested parties; Aruppukottai Municipality; District Collector Virudhunagar; Muslim Big Street; Sy.No22/2, 22/3, 22/4; Door No.16; three-month compliance timeline; no costs. Disposition: writ petition disposed of with administrative directions to the Municipal Commissioner, Aruppukottai; no precedent engaged; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Writ of mandamus effectively granted in the form of directions: the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2025 and pass orders after a personal hearing to the petitioner and all other interested parties, to ensure removal of the encroachment made by the neighbouring property owner, and to complete the exercise within three months from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs awarded (para 30).