Boominathan Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

Boominathan Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 03.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

Boominathan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub Division, Samayanallur, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Palamedu Police Station, Palamedu, Madurai District.

4.Krishnamoorthy

5.Natarajan ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/5

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

take action on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 02.09.2024 within a time frame as fixed by this Court and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhana Krishnan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The present petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take action on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 02.09.2024.

2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is in possession of the property and the respondents 4 and 5 caused dispossession to the property. Thereafter, the petitioner lodged the complaint before the third respondent on 16.08.2024. But no action was taken. Again on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/5

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

02.09.2024, lodged complaint through registered post and the same was also not considered. Therefore, the petitioner filed the present writ petition to consider the representation.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents would submit the representation of the petitioner was under consideration and they will dispose the representation within a week.

5. Considering the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with.

6. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the official respondents that they will dispose the representation of the petitioner within a week, it is appropriate to direct the second respondent to consider the representation in accordance with law on merits, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/5

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

7. With the above said observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

03.02.2025

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Sub Division, Samayanallur, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Palamedu Police Station, Palamedu, Madurai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4/5

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

P.DHANABAL, J.

BTR

W.P(MD)No.2965 of 2025

03.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5/5