Dismissed¶¶41

Stalin Raj K.S v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

Writ Petition (Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, B.Pugalandhi, J.) – Recruitment

Madras HC10 Dec 2025WP(MD)/29263/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

TNSTC Tirunelveli Region recruitment — driver cum conductor — BC category cut-off 29 marks; petitioner secured 28/50 and was not interviewed; 1:4 interview ratio per Government Letter Lr.(MS) No. 105/C1/2023-1 dated 17.07.2023; mandamus sought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed, no costs, connected WMP closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, B.Pugalandhi, J., order dated 10.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner had not obtained the requisite score as per the selection procedure, the Court was not inclined to entertain the writ petition. ¶¶36-37

Stalin Raj K.S Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025 and WMP(MD) No.22624 of 2025

Stalin Raj K.S

... Petitioner

1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavansalai, Park Town,

¶11

Chennai - 02.

¶12

2.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Tirunelveli Region), Rep. by its Managing Director, No.23/2, Thoothukudi Road, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli - 627 003.

¶13

3.The District Employment Officer, District Employment and Career Guindance Centre, Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's candidature and allow him to participate in the interview for the post of driver cum

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025

¶18

conductor in TNSTC and select him based on his performance

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.B.S. Shivashankar, For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The petitioner, with a grievance that though he has

¶22

secured 28 marks out of 50 marks in the written examination, he has

¶23

not been selected for the post of driver cum conductor, as notified by the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli Region), Tirunelveli, has approached this Court.

¶24

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶25

submits that the petitioner has participated in the selection process for the post of driver cum conductor, as per the notification issued by the second respondent herein. He has secured 28 marks out of 50 marks. Apart from that, he is having an experience as a temporary driver/conductor in Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. In order to substantiate the same, the petitioner has also enclosed the service log sheets for the years 2004, 2006 and 2007. He further

¶26

2/6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025

¶29

submits that the petitioner satisfies all the eligibility criteria, however, his candidature for the post of driver-cum conductor has been rejected.

¶30

3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that the writ petitioner belongs to Backward Classes(BC) category and under this Category, 33 vacancies have been allotted and 39 vacancies have been allotted in General Category (GT). As per the Government letter in Lr.(MS) No. 105/C1/2023-1, dated 17.07.2023 issued by the Transport (C1) Department Secretariat, Chennai, candidates, who have qualified in the written examination, were called for interview in the ratio of 1:4 against the notified vacancies. Accordingly, 132 persons were called for interview for 33 vacancies in BC category and 156 persons were called for interview for 39 vacancies in GT category. Among those called for interview in G.T. Category, 143 persons belonged to BC category. Totally 275 persons were called for interview under BC category.

¶31

3/6

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025

¶34

3.1.The learned standing counsel further submits that

¶35

based on the cut-off score, out of 905 persons, who passed the written test, 793 persons were BC category, where the highest score was 41 and the lowest score was 9. Based on 1:4 ratio in BC category, the highest score was 41 and the cut off marks has been fixed as 29. According to the learned Standing counsel, the petitioner and 61 other candidates have secured 28 marks and none of them were called for interview. Since the writ petitioner did not obtain the requisite score as per the applicable Government orders as well as the appointment Rules governing the post of Driver-cumConductor, he is not eligible for the post of Driver-cum-Conductor.

¶36

4.Considering the above submissions made by the

¶37

learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has not obtained the requisite score as per the selection procedure, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

¶38

4/6

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P(MD)No.29263 of 2025

¶41

5.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶42

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶43

10.12.2025

¶44

NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No vrn

¶45

¶46

1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavansalai, Park Town, Chennai - 02.

¶47

2.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Tirunelveli Region), Rep. by its Managing Director, No.23/2, Thoothukudi Road, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli - 627 003.

¶48