Disposed

Perumaal. R v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Jul 2025WP(MD)/29213/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider his representation seeking alteration of patta entries to include all legal heirs of his father and paternal uncle. Court directed the second respondent to decide on merits with notice within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Second respondent directed to consider representation dated 19.09.2022 and pass final orders on merits after notice to petitioner, respondents 4-6 and all legal heirs, within 12 weeks.

Perumaal. R Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10 .07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.29213 of 2022

R.Perumal

... Petitioner

.Vs.

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Karur District.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai,

¶12

Karur District.

¶13

3.The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District.

¶14

4.Boopathy

¶15

5.Marimuthu Krishnasamy

¶16

6.Rathinam ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to conduct the enquiry and alter the entries in patta Nos.3842, 2951, 2950, 3760, 2174, 2153, 3843,

¶18

1/6

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

¶21

3619,1255, 2029, 1253, 2173, 2956, 3625, 3737 based on the Petitioner’s representation, dated 19.09.2022.

¶22

For Petitioner : M/s.V.Vilma Rexy For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran 1 to 3 Addl.Govt. Pleader For Respondent-4 : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondent-5 : No appearance For Respondent-6 : Mr.G.Vidhya Maheswaran

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The Petitioner herein seeks a direction to the second respondent to conduct the enquiry and alter the entries in respect of patta Nos.3842, 2951, 2950, 3760, 2174, 2153, 3843, 3619,1255, 2029, 1253, 2173, 2956, 3625, 3737 by considering the Petitioner’s representation, dated 19.09.2022.

¶25

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶26

3.According to the Petitioner, the properties covered by the above mentioned pattas belong to his family and the same was in possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner’s father Rasa Gounder

¶27

2/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

¶30

and paternal uncle Manickam. After the death of the Petitioner’s father and paternal uncle, heirs of Petitioner’s father and paternal uncle without informing the Petitioner got the revenue documents mutated in their favour. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner submitted the instant representation on 19.09.2022 before the official respondents seeking inclusion of the names of all the heirs of the Petitioner’s father and paternal uncle. The same has not been considered till date. Hence the Petitioner is before this Court with the present Writ Petition for the relief stated supra.

¶31

4.Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader who appears for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation submitted by the Petitioner will be considered on its own merits within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶32

5.In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 19.09.2022 and pass final orders on its own merits after issuing notice to the Petitioner, respondents 4 to 6 and all the legal heirs of Petitioner’s father Rasa Gounder and Petitioner’s paternal uncle Manickam, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of a copy of this order.

¶33

3/6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

¶36

6.With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands

¶37

disposed of. No costs.

¶38

10.07.2025

¶39

NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶40

vsn

¶41

¶42

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Karur District.

¶43

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶44

3.The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District.

¶45

4/6

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

S.SOUNTHAR.,J.

vsn

ORDER MADE IN

W.P(MD)No.29213 of 2022

¶52

5/6

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

W.P(MD)NO.29213 of 2022

¶55

10.07.2025

¶56

6/6

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Perumaal. R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumaal. R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Niyaz Vs The Assistant Director

Ilias Ali Vs M.Suhanya

Karunanithi Vs The District Collector

Mahendran Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

A.Thilagam Vs The District Collector

Suganya Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer